October 3, 2026 by InsightLeap
A payment came in short, the remittance shows a deduction against an invoice you were sure was complete, and you want that money back. Vendor Central will let you dispute it, but the claim lives under Payments, away from the Operational Performance screens where chargebacks are handled, and the window to find and work it is shorter than it looks. This guide covers why the claim was raised, where to find it, how to file the first dispute, and how the re-dispute works when the first answer doesn't recover everything.
If you only need the definition, the Shortage Claim glossary entry is the short version, and the console paths below follow it. Some of the dispute and re-dispute detail comes from ChannelEngine and SPS Commerce, which both publish guidance for vendors working these claims, so we name whichever one said it.
A shortage claim is Amazon saying you invoiced for more units than its receiving process recorded. The gap sits between two numbers, the quantity you billed and the quantity the fulfillment center logged when the shipment was booked in. Where Amazon's count is lower, Amazon pays the lower one and raises a claim for the rest, taken off the payment on that invoice.
The two counts can come apart at several points between your dock and Amazon's, and every one of them lands as the same deduction:
ChannelEngine adds errors in Amazon's own receiving process to the list. That matters when you decide whether to dispute, because several of these causes start on Amazon's side of the dock, and your records are the only way to show it.
The timing works against you too, because Amazon usually opens the claim about five days before the invoice comes due, so the first time most teams see it is as a smaller number on the remittance than the one they billed.
Shortage claims are filed and tracked under Payments, and how far back you can see depends on which screen you open.
Vendor Central's navigation varies by region and account type, so check these labels in your own account before you write a path into a team process. On the remittance itself, the claim is one deduction line posted against a specific invoice; the remittance advice entry covers how to read those lines.
Shortage claims and chargebacks both come off your payments, so a lot of teams lump them together, but Vendor Central runs them on separate tracks. A shortage claim is tied to one invoice and settled on the payment side, which puts it outside the Operational Performance chargeback categories. Those categories score compliance defects on their own schedule and carry their own dispute path.
In practice, no scorecard records a shortage claim as a defect, so it never comes up in the weekly or monthly reviews a team builds around Operational Performance, and unless someone reads remittances line by line, the deductions pile up without anyone noticing.
If the deduction in front of you is a compliance charge (ASN accuracy, carton content, PO on-time, prep and labeling), you're on the wrong page. Our guide to Amazon chargebacks on Vendor Central explains the categories, and How to Dispute an Amazon Vendor Chargeback walks through that dispute.
Plan around a 30-day window. ChannelEngine says Amazon generally allows disputes within 30 days of the invoice due date, and Review/Dispute Shortages only lists about 30 days of claims, so the dispute window and the screen that lists the claim close on roughly the same schedule. Work claims as they appear, and when several are open, start with the oldest.
The packet ChannelEngine recommends for a shortage dispute:
Match the evidence to the cause where you can. A missing delivery scan is answered by delivery confirmation for that shipment, while a counting mistake at goods-in is answered by a packing list and photos showing the full quantity leaving your dock. If the ASN you sent for the shipment carried the right quantities, include it, because it shows Amazon had your count before the freight arrived.
Don't submit without attachments, since Amazon then has nothing to weigh against its own receiving count. Amazon reviews each claim within 35 days of creating it, so check the claim's status in the same screen on a fixed day each week.
SPS Commerce describes the re-dispute as a separate second step with its own rules. Once the first dispute on a shortage claim is resolved, any shortage that remains can be re-disputed once more, and Amazon reviews each shortage individually and in greater detail on that pass.
What that means for eligibility, going by SPS Commerce's guide:
On timing, SPS Commerce says Amazon typically resolves shortage re-disputes within 1 to 4 weeks of submission, and it tells vendors to work the oldest eligible claims first, especially those about to reach the two-year mark, when they expire.
Before you submit, SPS Commerce says to make sure all of your proof is already attached to the claim. Since you only get one pass, read the first decision for what it didn't accept and add the document that answers it, which is usually whatever ties your count to the exact shipment Amazon received: the delivery confirmation, the carton-level packing list, or the photos. Resubmitting the packet that lost the first time gives Amazon no reason to decide differently.
Where the re-dispute option sits in Vendor Central can vary by account, so open a resolved claim in your own account and confirm where the option appears before you write the step into a team process.
If most of your Amazon experience is in Seller Central, the thing to know is that a shortage claim comes off what Amazon pays you for an invoice. It shows up on the remittance as a deduction line against that invoice, and because no scorecard treats it as a defect, nothing in the performance reports will point you to it. The only way to find shortages is to read your payments, which most Seller Central teams never had to do.
Disputing claims one at a time gets money back, but it won't tell you which shipments keep coming in short. For that you need shortages as a rate, and three numbers do most of the work:
Then cut your own shortage log by the warehouse or 3PL that shipped, the carrier, and the receiving fulfillment center. If shortages cluster on one 3PL or one lane, the cause is probably on your side and worth fixing before you dispute the next claim. If they spread evenly across lanes and your paperwork is clean, keep disputing, because your records are what will win those claims.
The console lets you find and dispute individual claims, and three parts of the job stay manual.
InsightLeap does the pulling continuously. It keeps historic Vendor Central reports beyond what Amazon's interface lets you see and holds product-level purchase order data next to its Fill Rate (accepted and backordered), Net Received, and Monthly Estimated Net Received metrics, so the receiving side of a shortage is already lined up when a claim lands. The features page covers what it includes, and the metric glossary defines each field.
Open Payments, then Invoices, then Review/Dispute Shortages, and list every open claim with its invoice number, amount, and invoice due date. Take the oldest first, pull the packet for each, and file. Then look in View all Invoices for anything from the last 90 days nobody touched, and put the Review/Dispute Shortages check on the calendar for the same day every week.